Monday, January 25, 2010
Race to the Top
Edutopia has new poll asking “Should teacher unions support their state's Race to the Top efforts?” I do not know if I support the Race to the Top because I, along with most, do not understand what is in the proposal or what will be in it. However, I know my local union opposes it. It seems like most union members become very defensive when they hear ideas regarding evaluations and performance pay. I can understand the fear of losing your job and performance pay might seem unfair depending on the group of students you have. But we all know that some teachers are better than others. And we all know some underperforming teachers that just do not care enough to improve their methods. What can a school do about them? We can offer carrots or sticks. It is not clear if the Race to the Top will include rewards and/or consequences. Either way, I do not worry about such proposals because I think good teachers should be rewarded and ineffective teachers should be held accountable. I am not saying teachers should be fired for bad test scores in a single year, but hopefully underperforming teachers can be identified to be provided resources to improve their methods. What do you think? Do schools need carrots or sticks to encourage better teaching? Or do schools need something else?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)

I to am unsure about Race to the Top and what exactly it entails. I am torn - I used to work in the "business" world and am very familiar with my raise and pay being based on my performance. I think the part that gets a little "sticky" is that can a teacher's performance really be objective when there are other people involved? I have had parents get very angry and upset with me because I hold their student accountable. I also have students who do not complete homework and there is little to no support from home. Do I continue to "nag" and try to figure out what to do? Yes. Will that child's performance reflect on me? How will that affect my performance rating?
ReplyDeleteI also agree that there are teachers who perhaps need more incentive to improve their teaching practices and methods.
I am not sure if I have the complete answer. But, why is it that "we" the taxpayers were forced to bail out the bankers and car makers and they didn't get performance ratings attached to their paychecks. However, that is the answer for the school systems? Hmmm....
I found it interesting when I broadcast the local school board meeting and listened to the comments made by the school board members. One person who was a former principal said that sending in the letter to indicate we were supporting the RTT felt to him like he was in a back alley signing a loan form with his arm locked behind his back by a loan shark.
ReplyDeleteIt seems to me on the subject of merit pay for teachers most of us could support the idea after we have merit pay for legislators.
bye for now
bf